>>8167010> Why did you cut out nearly 3 years worth of data?I don't run Wrestlenomics. They cut out 3 years of data, because this graph is showing current weekly trends. It's also not showing 20 years of WWE if you've noticed.
>Even on this partial set the dip is consistent with WWE which also dips at the end of the year.I extended the graph for your pleasure so that you can compare it to last year. December and January will be interesting.
Listen, I'm not extrapolating the end of AEW from one awful month. I'm just disagreeing with "the ratings are the same as always though." They simply aren't.
