>>6990356False equivalence.
*anally rapes you*
>>6990364That's because they're impressive and enrapturing the first time you see them. The condition of diminishing returns is that they're worse as time goes on, the more you see them, the less value and merit they have.
It's natural upon first or irregular viewing, they're great. Subjected at length, they're very bad.
*anally rapes you*
>>6990369Shut up....BITCH!!!
