>>8222747Not really. I argued why it was swill and argued what about my show was better. You accused me of elitism (irony) and deflected. The proper response would be a critical defense of the strong points of your favored show in contrast, or, if you want to stand by your original argument that all wrestling is the same, a criticism of my points about how it's different and why those differences are good. This is how a 'debate' works, or even simple discourse.
You have done neither, but instead deflect and dismiss. This leads me to dismiss, because there is nothing else for me to contest, no point to counter, simply 'nu huh' or 'he who smelt it dealt it'. I have nothing constructive to work off of.
