>>11883107>Your opinions about "the greater implications" do not change the observable fact that sex and gender are distinct phenomena.this is interesting when you consider that generally the story of women is one of alleged universal discrimination. while I don't actually agree with this idea we can observe that while the social roles and outward trappings of the female gender are somewhat distinct among cultures, they are universally tied to the genitals an individual is born with.
most interesting to me is fact that almost all trans are also anglophiles. that is to say that what they believe makes someone a woman is viewed through the lens of the anglosphere. if gender is such a broad concept why is it always pink dress princess makeup? why doesn't anyone identify as swahili woman?
it is also interesting that gender identity is geographically linked, meaning that males raised in china are observably male irrespective of any greater biological force. a white boy raised by the chinese will be male (chinese). how do reconcile this with the idea that gender is somehow immutable and biological? why are more people trans now with society in the west becoming increasingly less gender-diarchic?
