Quoted By:
good day, i have a series of announcements:
>trans women = men
>trans men = women
>if trans women = cis women, then the distinction wouldn't be necessary
>therefore, if, for example, we take trans women, then trans woman = cis woman, then 'cis woman representation' would EQUAL 'trans woman representation'
>as such, the call for "TRANS" representation would not be necessary
in laymen's terms: even transgendered women/men don't see themselves as A-C-T-U-A-L women/men. if they did, the distinction wouldn't be necessary.
