>>14226024How the fuck did any of you ever value this dorks “journalism”? He uses too many words to say nothing. Paragraphs that can always be summed up as “my inside sources (1 person, maybe, who even knows) claims thing, and thing may be true or may not be true (depending on my personal feelings about the wrestler involved, no bias obviously). It’s super true, but maybe not. You can trust me and my sources but plans change so I can say anything and “technically” not be wrong”
Generously add in “Um”s and “ya know”s to taste.
