>>12931367>You tell me, I don't equate them, you're the one who does.except i didn't
love how you claim you didn't post that, you come at me, supposing you're legit that you didn't post that, entering yourself into my chain, with
>>12931123when all i did was mock the star ratings reference and introduce "match quality"
don't forget, you came at me, not the other way around
