Quoted By:
>Headlining is hard. This was maybe my answer to McMahon, whom, as much as I admire him, I do quibble with. WWE had a very medieval philosophy: that if the face was a good man, the match would draw. We look at real history and it’s not that simple. McMahon can say that Hogan became champion and reigned for a dozen years, and he was wise and good. But McMahon doesn’t ask the question: What was Hogan’s tax policy? Did he maintain a standing erection? What did he do in times of KWAB? And what about all these jobbers? By the end of the event, André is gone but all of the jobbers aren’t gone – they’re at the backstage. Did Hogan pursue a policy of systematic pearl harbor and squash them? Even the little baby jobbers, in their little jobber cradles?
