>>15660160>The audiovisual presentation of a televised wrestling show is everything. If you're displaying the wrong color scheme, if your entrance themes suck, if you have no regard for art direction whatsoever, then it will turn people off more than any in-ring stink ever would.>Then again, the purest version of wrestling will always be house shows/untelevised events>The boom periods in wrestling likely wouldn't have happened if they hadn't been in line with an agenda pushed by the powers that be>Bob Holly was quite a good wrestler, and he deserved the little main event push he got in 2004>06/07 ECW was regularly better than Raw>Mike Tenay was the greatest play by play commentator of all time>Losing streak storylines are dimes>The future of pro wrestling lies in the still ''innocent'' marky territories of the world, where 99% of the crowd doesn't know jack shit about ''the work''>Nice guys don't always finish last>>15660492Pro wrestling could rival Greek theater, and you have more chances of reaching that place with competent writers than without them. Emphasis on competent, which excludes all of the trash tv hollywood-esque specialists they've had for so long. Storyboarding is the least that you could do for your show.
