>>18926702>>18926746walk with me for a minute
they were covered up as much as possible. the assailant is barely on camera, it's not even 10 seconds, they didn't want the viewer getting a good look.
you might want to find a clip if you can or replay it on 'flix/'cock to see the whole thing in good quality, but what i think we can determine about the assailant from scant moments they were on screen:
>tallish for a woman>white or white-passing from a distance>has big boobs>has skinny legs>employs a knee strike, association with kneesnow where does that lead us?
