>>4987947Nice try, but even if you discredit wrestling in Japan, the Knockouts were more heavily featured and doing things before the women in WWE were. My proof is that I have the necessary historical thinking skills that you severely lack because you are uneducated and can't connect the dots between historical periods and the fact that WWE started featuring their women more when women in MMA were getting heavily spotlighted in the early 2010s which proved that women in combat sports could draw if they were placed in that position. Vince saw this and didn't want to be behind the times, who did he sign not too long after that BTW?
Because you fail to see that connection means you probably don't have the adequate historical thinking skills to follow through. Let me give you an example you'll understand: Crust Punk in late 80s Sweden heavily influenced the 90s Swedish death metal even if they're not intrinsically linked. Sorry, you lack those historical skills. Total Bellas, but especially Nikki who was indeed a diva brought a substantial increase in female viewers more than any time in the company's history. Nikki was the major star of that show and why it branched off to it's own thing, I don't care for reality TV or Nikki, but she as well as women in MMA have more of a claim for the "Women's Revolution" than anyone else. Here's Steph McMahon talking about the increase in viewership from Total Divas
https://www.sportspromedia.com/news/wwe-female-audience-stephanie-mcmahon-content-storytelling-total-bellas/I don't care f you don't like Joshi, Io Shirai or whatever, hell, I don't care if you claim she's a draw or not. What I do know is that the Four Horsewomen didn't start anything, and there's no proof that they did unlike the previous points I made
