>>13986937I don't get it. By what objective metric are any of these people "duh best rassler"? Wrestling is a work, therefore wins and losses are moot. The only thing close to an objective metric is dd/s (dimes drawn per second) and we all know who the best dd/s wrestlers are. Of course, using this metric will attract the tranners who go
>"UHH BUT MUH MCDONALDS IS THE MOST PROFITABLE FOOD CHAIN THAT LE DOESN'T MEAN IT'S THE BEST!"And okay, fair enough. But these stars and internet forum opinions are even bigger bullshit metrics. I've seen Will Ospreay wrestle, the only thing I can say I liked about him is how well he sells offense but I guess that just comes with the jap territory. I've also seen plenty of Suzuki Motorolakun vs Tahahashi "Toyota-san" Subaru matches and, while they are decent, they tend to get boring after the 10th one.
Also, there are so many different wrestling styles that it's pure faggotry to say only people working a certain style can be considered good.
