>>13707574He's literally making the arguement that having more vendors with the same size audience makes him (tony or a effort posting larper) more money. It makes sense that the same amount of people could buy more from a higher ratio of vendors to patrons, but
>Venues are already scaled in terms of concessions to sell to a full house because they also like money>A larger but more empty arena is going to produce a whole more wage and product shrinkage>it's going to cost more to rent>it's going to cost more to rigI really think this is tony because they are so disconnected from costs in their analysis that their thesis can only come from a non functioning nepo baby that never had a benchmark he couldn't bull rush through with cash. I'm sure a whole graduating class worth of women were driving around audis at 17 after sharing a school with Tony.
