>>16005222>I just discovered what rankings are, that means everyone else did toWrong
>about wwe having good ratingsIt's about WWE having bad actually, ratings, you slow pedophile. It's also one of the main entertainment newspapers that covers TV ratings, and they're talking about rankings, because rankings have been important for decades. Now here's Meltzer breaking down Raw's demo two years before that, which he has also done every fucking week.