>>9057446that is an incredibly stupid thing to say.
"Average shows" we can give a 5/10 in interesting story line, all the way up to 10/10 in interesting story lines.
WWE, again, averages a solid 3 out of 10.
Saying WWE creative is mediocre is a blatant lie.
people bitch about WWE story lines, because they consistently fuck them up, they fumble story lines that Actually talented people put into play, after being given some creative freedom.
get something right - WWE didnt "create a great story with the blodline"
WWE allowed Sami to improvise weekly, and steer the bloodline ship to what it is today.
Every single "good" story line WWE has stumbled into in the last 15 years has been accidental AND led by a talent not listening, you can not underestimate this fact
