>>18760913They don't. Why do you think they keep throwing random names at people? It's easier to argue against a perceived entity than it is to engage with someone based on their ideas and viewpoint. When he accuses someone of being "Rovert", he now is able to deflect from the main point the person he was talking to was making, he can refer to his year long headcanon and talk in an authoritive way by appealing to "common" knowledge. Do you never notice how whenever the first person who accuses someone of being Rovert appears, there's always immediately 2-3 "other" people agreeing or responding to the person he's calling Rovert repeating mostly the same things? He's trying to make it look as though the majority agrees with him when it's really just himself. There has been evidence of this when he gets banned and all of those posts disappear and the archives show those posts replying to himself or to another anon multiple times. When he calls you names or refers to things that "happened" he hopes you aren't up to speed with his web of lies and just get confused. When you then respond by saying you're not the person he's referring to he pivots to saying you're pretending you're not Rovert. In either case you have to disprove a negative which he then immediately drops as he moves the goalpost to the next thing he accuses you with. If all of this fails he sets up easy dunks by falseflagging as someone who dislikes Iyo and hitting that post with a comeback he spams for weeks on end while ignoring any point you make. He's lucky this board doesn't have IDs and unique post counts or he would have been exposed ages ago. Why do you think this only started happening to this extent after they removed the unique post counter?
