>>17427520I think you're right - we already accepted machines and eventually computers doing jobs for us since the industrial revolution but art was something that largely came from the mind, now that computers are encroaching into that space and people are accepting it it's just a big and unusual shift. Of course white collar workers are threatened because their jobs are the first to go and they know how pointless their jobs are but it's easier to accept that since we've seen work optimisation and obsolescence for centuries now
>>17427960you're also right - there will always be a market for "high art" by people who really value "art" and that won't change at all. You think those millionaire art collectors and chinstroking culturefags are suddenly gonna be like "well I guess AI art is better" lol nah they'll defend and support real humans making art. I am sort AI-skeptical and even I don't give a shit about some graphic designer being replaced, or AI sloppa being valued by people who don't really care about art that much anyway
