>>10095234The message is written by a 90IQ for 70IQs
>b-b-but if you'd just work together...The same people blaming corporate farming practices for world hunger are the people condemning the use of chemical fertilizers, which are ending world hunger, but can only be sustainable without ruining the soil if cycled in and out with exactly high quality manure, which is produced primarily by cows, which is what the short-sighted retard subhuman cunts are bemoaning the "waste" of arable land keeping alive, even though half the cattle in the US graze on shrubland not useful for any crops whatsoever due to low rainfall and deep water table.
Without raising livestock, especially cows, with some of our land the chemical fertilizers will deplete the soil inevitably leading to mass famine.
Without the heavy and continuous use of the chemical fertilizers near half of the Earth's current population would starve.
The way to feed more people in Africa would be to aggressively irrigate Africa and automate farming of scale in Africa, which is already slowly being done, and the way to speed up that process would be to recolonize Africa and displace the especially violent, corrupt, and ignorant gangs and governments thickly in among the more or less decent ones.
You are an absolute retard and no amount of whining about muh haves and muh have nots will ever make your kike bullshit more important to the survival of poor people than the global supply chain is, and your faggot "reformers" and state shills have never, could never, and will never create an adequate and efficient supply chain on their own, and serve only to gum up the works while still missing human and drug trafficking or willfully turning a blind eye.
Mark.
