>>11154968Where did I mention WWE once? Are you perhaps bringing them up because you're in a cult and applying the cult tactics of an approved boogeyman?
>>company surpasses WWE records promoting shows their wayBut my entire point -- Dave's entire point -- is that they're barely promoting All In, brainlet. Are you saying promoting your show to create a sense of hype leading in that you can turn into momentum coming out is a bad, WWE only tactic?
They didn't surpass records through promotion, by all accounts it seems they surpassed records through an incredibly ripe market (because the UK is starved for live events) and timing. Their promotion has been piss-poor, screeching about WWE just makes you easier to embarrass.
>>11154975It's afternoon.
