>>11278521Two problems there. Firstly Meltzer, unlike the Razzies, discusses both the best and the worst in wrestling, and he gives awards and reviews far more favorably to anything that his friends are involved in and anything outside the mainstream, and that's where the dishonesty lies.
And secondly, your analogy of the Raspberries doesn't hold up because it's based on them only rating the worst of popular mainstream movies while ignoring lesser known ones, as if that's what Dave does. But Dave only does that when it comes to negative reviews and the "worst" awards where he basically only takes WWE into consideration. He considers all companies when giving the positive awards and reviews.
