>>11390682The numbers are collected by a small sample size, so yes they are arbitrary and only matter to advertisers you weird lunatic.
>>11390692It's making money because if the state of TV right now and rights fees are enormous for everything. The actual popularity is much lower, it's just that the kids who grew up during the actual book period are all middle aged now and spending money on wrestling because they can. This is reflected in the actual demographics which show the average age of wrestling audiences is 43 - 64.
No new audience. Nothing since then has made a significant impact on new viewers. It's a clear decline.
>>11390708Yes but what is the profit? There isn't any. Aew runs at a loss. You don't understand how this works. I legitimately have worked in events for a long time and this is blatantly obvious, stop talking about things you don't understand.
>>11390711The irony of your post is truly sad.
