>>11494370Dogshit fuckin take you literally just thought to yourself "what would sound kind of right" and then pulled that out of your ass. We've all talked that flavor of shit before and can smell it from a mile away so don't bother denying. Your thought process:
>goldberg>known poor technical wrestler, therefore poor technical spear but big dude so goodwrong, goldberg's technique is as good as anyone's, legit football ddouble-leg takedown, size doesn't even factor in because he doesn't commit his full weight half the time
>edge>good wrestler but lanky, that must be why his spear sucks, not because he just wraps his arm around them and falls gently to his keeswrong, edge's performs his spear in the safest way possible for both parties, that's why it looks shit, it's shit by design not because of his size, i guess you could call that good technique though
>rhino>everyone always talks about his spear being the best so i'll just say thata broken clock is right twice a day
>reigns>poor technical wrestler so his spear must be poor toowrong again, reigns performs a different spear to the others in that he jumps into it and strikes his opponent horizontally with his full weight with both feet in the air, it looks impressive a lot of the time, he might be a basic wrestler but the spear is one of the things he does well, watch stevie richards video on it
