>>11778629You realize that makes you wrong here, right?
You claimed he "clearly" didn't read a book, he proved you wrong by quoting the relevant part of the book to the discussion, and you accepted it but instead turned your argument into "w-well you couldn't quote from memory so..."
How about you explain why you disingenuously dismissed a correct comparison to a book? I'd love to hear you explain how you aren't a pseud trying to bluff his way into winning an argument online...