[9 / 1 / 6]
Quoted By: >>12667830 >>12667834 >>12667840 >>12667846
Can we talk about how retarded this current belt lineage is?
>wwe title has all the belt lineage of hogan, bruno, bob backlund, ect
>universal title doesn't carry this lineage and this is what romans 1200 day reign is on
even if roman surpassed hogans reign should it even count if its not even for the same belt?
it gets even more confusing now because they merged them into a new belt, but officially on WWE's website they still have them as separate belts to retain the lineage I'm guessing.
in your opinion if he beats Hogan's reign should it even count if its not the same belt? backlunds reign is even longer but they never reference it anymore and its almost as if they're sweeping it under the rug or retconning it
>wwe title has all the belt lineage of hogan, bruno, bob backlund, ect
>universal title doesn't carry this lineage and this is what romans 1200 day reign is on
even if roman surpassed hogans reign should it even count if its not even for the same belt?
it gets even more confusing now because they merged them into a new belt, but officially on WWE's website they still have them as separate belts to retain the lineage I'm guessing.
in your opinion if he beats Hogan's reign should it even count if its not the same belt? backlunds reign is even longer but they never reference it anymore and its almost as if they're sweeping it under the rug or retconning it
