>>12699575>I'm talking about brand identity and TV production.Yeah, after you got corrected you're pretending all you were ever talking about was TNA having a six-sided ring and thus that made them completely different and not a retirement home for washed up and cast out WWE guys.
>TNA was not a TV brand right away, AEW was.yes, thus under your own logic it's erroneous to compare the two
>You brought up TNA.I didn't. You said a bunch of shit that was blatantly incorrect, and I corrected you. And if you want to go down this route, the guy who originally invoked TNA was not talking about the production at all, but the way the show was booked, which makes your little conniption fit even more laughable
>TNA had it's own identity right awayIt didn't, apart from the X-Division (which really wasn't any different from WWE's cruiserweight division at the time, it was just given more precedence) none of the shit you're talking about was there at the start of the company, it developed over years.
>You keep sperging out but you have no idea what you're talking about and you are shoot retarded.but enough about you
> not anything that anyone else is talking about then you need serious psychological helpYou're literally the only person who's been talking about "brand identity and TV production". I'm not talking about it, the guy you responded to wasn't talking about it. If you're so deadset on having a conversation with yourself, stop taking your pills and clean your grungy ass mirror.