>>12872014>>12872126>>12872231His reviews are ~80% aew, ~20% wwe.
Of the aew things, he talks shit about ~95% of the things they do (and he watches almost everything aew does)
Of the wwe things, he talks shit about ~20% of the things they do (because he doesn't watch the rest that he considers bad)
So overall, his reviews can be broken down into:
- aew bad (76%)
- aew good (4%)
- wwe bad (4%)
- wwe good (16%)
That 76% is where the monotony comes from. I'm talking about purely the entertainment value of his podcast and the content that he puts out, not what he personally thinks about those companies.
>>12872504Thanks for the timestamped links anon, I'll check him out.
