>>13194408Dave knows as much about law as he knows ratings or what specific emotions are conveyed by certain facial features. The lawsuit is civil and here threshold for "proof" is lower. But she isn't trying to prove anything other than Vince stopped paying her and that is why she had the right to break the NDA. Period the end. The other shit is her trying to force him to pay and avoid things getting out into the public. She's shot her shot so to speak already. Vince now has a lot of money and no need to worry about flushing some down litigation. He has to prove that either
>a) their agreement was fulfilled the second she signed the NDA and got payment X>b) she received all her payments and is now using litigation as extortion>c) her recent litigation is a direct violation of the NDA and precludes him from paying her more, and also opens her up to be counter suedShe will be counter-sued. Vince will not refuse to pay he will make sure she is court and buried under legal fees also.
