>>13216002I'm not saying i trust TK not to fuck up the rankings, because he's buggered them royally in the past. however, Dave really doesn't understand that as a booking tool that brings new challengers for titles every so often, you can't just list the absolute top guys in the company. it has to be whoever has distinguished themselves "recently", so a top guy who's lost his title challenge can drop down and be replaced by the next challenger. what would improve them, though, is the challenger-to-be beating another ranked guy or two on the way to challenging for the title, so you could see them progress up the rankings and have meaningful wins that establish them.
