>>13716677anon how the hell are you able to determine all of that from a single post on an anonymous forum? you realize how mental you sound right now? you talk about made-up terms when you've made up an entire scenario in your head based off of my one post. funny how you say i've adopted some kind of mysterious language when you're regurgitating the same bullshit you picked up from other boards. try posting an independent thought for once. wwe can only sweep this shit under the rug so many times. vince got caught with his pants down (almost literally) and took brock down with him inadvertently. boo fucking hoo. maybe brock should have exercised a little more discretion. don't like that you can't play brock in your little video game? don't buy it then faggot. doesn't change the fact that the WWE made the appropriate decision if they wanted to avoid harming their image. cry about it you fucking manchild
>>13716743this is the equivalent of covering your ears and going LALALALALALALALALALALALALLALALALALALA I CANT HEAR YOU
>>13716746nta but he's not facing criminal charges... he doesn't have to commit crimes to harm the image and reputation of the WWE. vince simply made the mistake of shitting where he eats, no pun intended. guy could have paid for any pussy he wanted but instead he used his executive power to make up a nonsense legal position out of thin air and started to dole her out to employees like she was the company stapler. if you expect the wwe, a publicly traded company, to just shrug their shoulders and ignore it then you're simply retarded
>>13716795so you don't know?
