>>13889799that's very antisemitic and true
>>13889811he knew how to book everyone, he made dudes who would be midcard shitters in other companies look like absolute stars by bringing out the best in them. he knew how to book everyone to their fullest potential, better than anyone else.
>>13889838>Can't be that great if he ruined his brand, couldn't save its revival later on, and now his greatest legacy unironically might be being a sidepiece to bigger wrestlers.retarded statement, just because someone's a failure as a businessman doesn't mean they're not a great artist. in fact, the two don't coincide more often than not.
>There'll be a time when people go "Remember Paul Heyman, the guy who managed Roman Reigns?" and then someone will try to talk about OG ECW and say "What's that?"yeah zoomers are faggots, I know. that doesn't take away from how great he was at what he did, or how significantly he impacted wrestling as a whole. he's right that without him, there would be no WWF attitude. without him, there wouldn't even have been a Stone Cold. In his prime, he was the mad scientist, and he was a very singular genius.
