>>13935031If you were trying to do that, you would've just gone with exposition, rising action and climax, because climax, falling action and ending often all take place at the same time in wrestling, you wouldn't have still listed both climax (or "resolution") and ending. Anyway.
>ExpositionDanielson challenges Ospreay. They both explain their motivations to fight each other. Ospreay believes he's the best wrestler in the world, Danielson wants to give him a chance to prove it, Ospreay wants to be the standard bearer of AEW.
>Rising ActionDanielson wrestles Shibata, says he and Shibata were both told they'd never wrestle again, but both came back and Will Ospreay can't walk in his shoes. Ospreay responds by saying "the shoes are too small", i.e. he's already exceeded Bryan Danielson's legacy and to prove it, he challenges the man Danielson just wrestled, Shibata, a man who defeated him several years ago when he was a Jr. Heavyweight.
>Climax, falling action, ending. Ospreay and Danielson are going to wrestle. The match will have a winner and a loser, the winner will be proven to be the better man and go onto bigger and better things, the latter will be forced to acknowledge the other is the better wrestler.
In case that's too complicated for you, I'll explain it again: The story of Ospreay vs. Shibata and Danielson vs. Shibata are that they are part of the "Rising Action" for the story of Ospreay vs. Danielson. They're part of the "build" as it were. Shibata is a supporting character within the context of the larger story.
