>>14185569They're gonna go the whole lock-step storyline.
Rock's a Hollywood stooge, all the marks and fans know he was given that seat at the board to be Hollywood's enforcer for Hollywood politics to make their way into the WWE.
Meanwhile HHH is a pro wrestler, Heyman's a pro wrestler, they don't wanna do the Hollywood shit, they wanna do professional wrestling, draw money, and put the best show possible on.
In a way, like how Biden's the establishment politician, and Trump's "the outsider breaking the system from within".
Austin was a rebel fighting the authority too and he was over.
Had Austin done that in 1980, he would've been a great heel doing that.
In the same way, some people like Trump's defiance of the old order, and others despise him for it.
The Rock came in to turn the WWE into a Hollywood production. Openly democrat btw.
Haitch stopped him, using his stroke as the head of creative. Openly apolitical, for business reasons. Drawing money, remember.
Wrestling was always a bit of a rebel in America, and the old order thinks it can buy the WWE and change it on a whim.
This creates the perfect tension for the most thrilling and invigorating storyline since Austin-McMahon.
Wrestling, versus Hollywood.
Real athletic performance, versus CGI with stunt doubles.
Authentic, versus fake.
What people want, versus what they hate.
Austin, versus McMahon.
Haitch, versus Rock.
I know blogposts suck dick but this explains why the Undertaker came out to help a wrestler against Hollywood's stooge.
