>>14337198the problem with the meltzer stars is the notion that those who love them and Melzer himself see them as an objective measurement, not a subjective one. Which is clearly bullshit, since even in that interview Meltzer doesnt go into detail and just speaks from an "me" perspective. "If the moves looked well executed to me... if something suprised me... If the finish looked smooth to me". Its all wishy-washy. Meltzer and his fans act like the stars are comparable to the Metric system, where 1 meter = 1 meter, 2 Meters = 2, 50 cm = 0.5 meter, etc.
So if you go tout that your stars are an objective measurement of whats good and what isnt, and the general public considers something a masterpiece but it isnt rated as such, there is a disconnect.
Meltzer is to wrestling what IGN is to videogames: journalism cancer.
