>>14540484>So what goes into a star rating?>"uhm uh if it suprised me"subjective, entirely his own opinion
>"uhm uh if the crowd gets off of it"hypocritical, since he rates Hogan matches fairly low and Hogan is fucking OVER as fuck. Especially the Slam Heard Around The World got the crowd into a frenzy, and they were hot for the entire match. That match got negative stars. If the crowd is one of 4 criterias he mentioned, that match being low is a lie.
>if it looked goodSee
>>14538576 . This shit does not look good, that whole segment was whack and he gave the match 6.5 stars. For something that is apparently "divine stuff", this spot was pure wank. What psychology goes into Ospreay purposefully giving away his momentum, just for such a shitty indie-tier spot where 1 slap gets a comical sell?
>if it was well executedSee
>>14538546 . Again, a dangerous botch was gifted a 6.5 star rating.
Dave Meltzers Opinion Ratings are as objective and unbiased as the opinion of a random political twitter faggot... Not! Stop being a Mememltzer cultist.
