>>14552186>people>theyYou are part of the problem. You should not be acknowledging arguments that include "they", "people", "some" or any altogether nebulous constellation of subjects.
It's one thing to state maxims or sayings or mantras in such a manner. It's another to pretend you're making a specific criticism, but you're too lazy or too much of a bitch to specify who you're replying to. This is why you won't see me criticizing wrestlers/athletes/celebrities for replying to people with <10 followers - it's better than passive-aggressively responding to "haters" without naming names.
