>>14558691Yes, but the screenshot you posted is him saying they are objective truths, so that doesn't support your argument.
If you do approach something objectively then your score will be objective but only if you know what you're talking about and only in the context that you review it in.
But yeah, he doesn't even know what his own stars are based on and if two job guys did the exact same match, move for move, with the same build up as Ospreay Vs Danielson he wouldn't give it the same rating despite being the exact same. His ratings are based on mark bias, based on who is pushed hardest, how many moves they do, etc.
