>>14842184it's very strange that you changed the subject when the discussion stopped going the way you wanted, but, because I'm a gracious person and don't want you to feel like you got nothing out of this conversation, I'll stipulate. WWE does have a niche of extremely motivated fans who will pay anything they ask to get "The WWE Experience", like a much, much smaller version of Disney, I suppose. That is an asset of theirs and they parlay it into things like the Peacock deal quite well. I again think it speaks to a lack of confidence, but it works fine enough for them, so I'll give them credit.
So let's say All In beats Wrestlemania by about 4x on PPV and Wrestlemania beats All In by about 4x on ticket revenue. Really, it's closer to 8x on PPV and 2x on tickets because of Wrestlemania being two days, but again, I'm being a nice guy, so I won't force that point. So I'm willing to say Wrestlemania is roughly equal to All In, sometimes. Congratulations, you convinced me.
>>14842195Fair enough. WWE got people to watch 1.3 billion live minutes of their free event. Congratulations to them.
>>14842233That was unfair of me, you would probably hear better music listening to the busker.
