>>14937796Weird, I went from not explaining at all.....to explaining but it was a bad explanation...funny how that works. And you're accusing other people of being on the payroll? Just glorious.
>>14937586Every argument you're making goes both ways but you'd rather be a retard than a neutral observer.
Insisting that "WWE" (while refusing to provide a specific department/contact) is leaking the numbers:
1) Assumes marks care more about fast national ratings than they do AEW shows themselves, YouTube reviews, Cagematch ratings, etc.
2) Assumes marks give a shit about fast nationals Tweets over content that actually matters (cool moves, news on injuries/free agency, TV deals or creative plans
3) Is the most retarded, you're perfectly fine with insisting things have been "traced back" to WWE, but you and the other paid liars can't name any names or provide any proof whatsoever -- but the idea that WBD wouldn't do the same thing you're accusing WWE of, knowing you ALSO couldn't prove anything and ALSO wouldn't be able to name any names....that's somehow beyond the pale. Asinine, contradictory, begging the question nonsense.
4)
>people have confirmed>from WWEThat's not a confirmation you fucking goof ass. If your bank "confirms" that you walked into the bank and withdrew $5,000 from your account (at a time you were out of the country), what are you going to say to that? "Oh OK, as long as you've confirmed it". No, you're going to demand evidence. Video, audio, signatures. These paid liar journalists have proven nothing at all.
So who is it that they're afraid to throw under the bus, exactly? Their leakers? Executives, interns, WHO exactly? Or is their source just someone who otherwise shouldn't be able to have the information, and yet somehow does - so they're working backwards to blame WWE and find the True Source™?
It always kills me just how little brainstorming and critical thinking so-called smart people are willing to do.
