>>15123356Wouldn't this work better to go up to 1000 people at an AEW, WWE or TNA show and do this?
(You will have to round <150 up to 1000 to make it work for TNA, assuming a 50% survey rate)
Ask person to name active wrestlers on the show they just attended
If they name 10 on the active AEW/WWE/TNA* rosters, give them a dollar.
If they name at least 5 but not 10, give them a candy bar.
If they name 4 or less, punch them in the face.
I'd suspect WWE fan can name the least amount of wrestlers - but what does that really mean?
Getting fans to go to the shows even if they haven't followed the product every week for years seems ideal to me.
What do you call it when 90% of fans at a TNA show can name 10 current TNA wrestlers, 50% for AEW fan and 20% for WWE fan?
It's not so much that wrestling is for gay retarded unemployed autistic sickos who should be put into camps, but more so that consistently following the goings on in the wrestling world would generally be indicative of a mental or social disorder - likely both.
