>>15174197>federal investigations move a glacial paceThey actually don't. It's been a year since the subpoena, and since all of the texts were leaked online, that evidence is now inadmissible in court. This isn't even getting into the fact that his old friend Trump will be appointing a new AG in January. If they had anything, they would've already charged him and then built the case while awaiting trial.
Also, the Feds don't like losing cases. This is why they never charged Trump with anything. Because they knew it would fall on its face and be overturned by the SC. So they left it up to the DEI dipshits in NYC to go the municipal route and embarrass themselves.
>generally always end in convictionJust like the steroid trial, huh? This case would be very similar because it would all hinge on the word of a singular disgruntled employee.
It's over.
