>>15273827There is no such thing as an objective measure of whether a wrestler is "good" or not.
That's because this is a fake sport. As such, it's sports entertainment. And "entertainment" is subjective. People enjoy different things. Some people enjoy the ability to make it look like a real fight. Some people enjoy acrobatics. Some people enjoy character work and drama. These are all subjective standards.
People need to spend less time shitting on the things in wrestling other people enjoy. What matters more is booking, match and card structure, and promotion. A wrestler can knock it out of the park in a good company that knows what it's doing or stink things up in a shit company that doesn't.
That's what Tony Khan doesn't get -- he can hire all the greats in the world and it doesn't change the fact that he knows jack fuck about running a wrestling business.
