>>15709589I literally watch AEW and think his usage has been terrible. I was fully aware I wouldn't be getting Rainmaker Okada at his peak, that simply wouldn't work, but the fourth most important guy in a stable that makes people change the channel routinely is a massive undershot.
You're the one trying to justify your emotions by seething about WWE instead of just admitting that a part of a TV show you watch is weaker than you'd hoped.
>>15709602Can you point to where I said I did? I'm fully capable of admitting that WWE would have probably gotten more use out of him, and that simple, effective NXT-tier booking would have done better by him, because I'm able to admit disappointment in shows I watch.
It's not even a metter of "WWE would have made him a megastar", Tony did less than the bare minimum of my expectations with Okada. He was featured LESS heavily at this year's All In than last year's All In, when he wasn't a contracted talent. He is LESS valuable and interesting in the company than BEFORE HE GOT FUCKING HIRED BY IT.
It's astounding, really.