>>15747645No it couldn't have, the whole
>popularity doesn't mean it's betterIs done to death in every medium and has a built-in refutation of "lack of popularity doesn't mean it is, either"
Until someone can actually explain critically why AEW has artistic value, it's just coping with not being popular. And no, Meltzer doesn't count because he has observably dog shit taste and rated Gargano vs Cole high which is one of the worst-worked matches I've ever seen, so his entire ratings are poisoned by that.
