>>16137931>Republicans are not the anti-corporation party because you cannot have an anti-corporation candidate. Money controls politics, as do lobbyistsLook, I basically agree with you. It's a grim situation we're in.
But you know what? Trump winning in 2016 actually does give me some hope. Despite the fact I think Trump is a retarded corporate cocksucker, I think he was a genuine surprise for pretty much every politician, and I think it shows that even now, politics are unpredictable enough that corporations can't fully control the results. What that means is that I think that we could be in a future within the next decade or two where an anti-corporation president manages to make it in, and I guarantee you that if that were to happen, it would be a paradigm shift that would change everything for the better.
At the end of the day either the Ds or the Rs are gonna need to change strategies. Right now, I unironically think Kamala winning is the the one path that has the most hope, because it almost certainly means Trumpism is over and hopefully whatever replaces it might be exactly what we need.
>The Democrat focus absolutely is nothing more than "orange man bad" at this point.That's what I said. That's what I mean when I say that democrats get to get away with the shit they get away with based exclusively on "Well, at least we're not Trump". That's all the more reason why I need Trumpism to end!
>Accelerationist retards (this is you) believe that by making all the worst decisions possible we will somehow hit a retardation singularityNo, I think I finally see where we differ now. You probably genuinely believe that if Trump were to be elected, he'd not be sucking up to corporate cock and serving the exact same masters Biden and Kamala do, just like he did back in 2016.
The country isn't gonna collapse. It's gonna keep being dogshit regardless of who wins. It's all a very well oiled corporate machine.
