>>16312972So last year it matched somewhat, which you use to claim makes it legit, which would also mean that the WWE provided list is legit, but this year you claim it isn't because maybe someone you don't like is in the top 10?
It's also clear to see how thoae calculations can be wildly off. They weight it by the number of items in the top ten, with no idea of actual sales, and not accounting for the competition that week which puts things into perspective. Punk sold over 600k in his first weekend off one shirt. That could be more than tge whole top ten for a week but that chart would weigh someone with 3 items in the top 10 higher than Punk.
Cody sold the most merch ever over WM40 weekend.
It makes no sense for WWE to work the numbers as it is info most people never even come across and they are more likely to sell by riding actual trends that build momentum instead of telling lies.
