>>16439094Tortuous interference requires the following key points ( among few others):
>"The existence of a contractual relationship or beneficial business relationship between two parties ... The contractual relationship is breached.... Damage to the party against whom the breach occurs" A finite contract with AEW that will end said relationship at a certain date and non compete. As the AEW contract expires it cannot be broken after the fact. AEW cannot compel Luchas to continue the contract without referring to whatever options they have written.
The best part is the last, and I will take my wiki-lawyer hat out for this:
>What is the damage? You can't damage AEW more than what it does to it self. It's operating at a loss, it's reputation is that it's a dying company that not even hiring people with way higher salaries and more air time than the Luchabros don't improve ticket sales and ratings, BRUV. Everyone knows it's a place people want to leave because Tony books a shit sandwich every week that will not get a single person over that isn't a meme flavor of the month
This isn't the NBA where negotiations and free agency is under some retarded over reaching rules. Wrestlers still don't have a union (Thanks Tony Khan) so they don't have unionized contracts A person is free to seek out and discuss their future job while on the job.
