One of two outcomes is possible here:
1) The state will dismiss her complaint because she consented to everything. Feeling "miserable and enraged" after you have sex with someone you agreed to have sex with does not amount to rape or sex trafficking. Vince McMahon cannot physically force people to cuck him via his ability to destroy their reputation. The law doesn't work that way.
2) The state will ignore the law and radically redefine case law to include "fear of reputational harm" as a form of deprival of sexual consent. This is possible, but unlikely in any jurisdiction other than the Southern District of New York.
In case it's not obvious by the first few sentences of this wikipedia article that her lawyers are clearly editing,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vince_McMahon_sex_trafficking_scandal(How the fuck is a scandal a lawsuit?)
there was a cabal of WWE employees and government officials (at federal and state level) who colluded to set this whole thing up before Vince was ever pushed out of the company. HHH was not originally emphasized because he was supposed to survive the takedown, they were trying to specifically get Johnny Ace, Vince, and Pritchard out. When the election didn't go how they planned and they lost any chance of winning this thing at the federal level, Grant and her Lawyer went rogue and are now going after the whole company.
