>>17113136It's dorky and misses the point when people claim wrestlers having a "limited moveset" is a flaw (it's all about the in-between) but getting over a series of signature spots is an inherent part of marketing a wrestler and "moveset" is a perfectly fine term for this.
People who complain about it being a "video game term" ignore that the WWE 2K games are a massive part of the industry. Obviously main roster WWE isn't about MOVEZ but they're in the business of pushing licensed games where the selling point is simming wrestlers doing their moves and that's one of the many things the on-screen product has to take into account. "Movesets" are worth 8 figures of yearly revenue.
