>>17308101>We have loan words from Latin languages, yes. The grammar has not been influenced by it at all.I want to argue with you, because I'm pedantic like that, but it would be such an uphill battle that it's not worth it. English doesn't have declensions or separate conjugations, variable word order, it's basically nothing like English except by pure coincidence, at times, by some writers.
>>17307516This is true. Much more Greek/Latin/French and even Arabic (sugar, admiral, etc) loan words
>>17307522All SOV languages should be banned, Katakana/Hiragana/Kanji is bullshit and Chinese loanwords are the worst
>>17307952I highly doubt this due to the sheer number of English loanwords/exposure in the Japanese language. Spanish verbs/nouns tend to have a high amount of Latinate, so while they're familiar to English speakers, they're Greek to Nihonjin
>>17308299Often Michael to the store went and he bars of chocolate bought. But in Japanese there's particles ejaculated all over the fucking sentence to make it a nightmare.