>>17373389biggest 2 problems TNA faces (and they are big ones, mind you) are: horrible roster, and being basically unwatchable on TV for most people.
i have no idea how to solve the roster issue. almost everyone they have in every division is dimeless. like the other poster said, hendry is good but he'll be in WWE before the end of the year, hardys are trying their hardest to get back into WWE and only signed a 1 year deal... they have no one else notable. who else do they have? the only other big names like ziggler and tessa are only there because they have nowhere else to go. if someone else worth a shit has had the option to go elsewhere, they've taken it. someone like moose could probably have gone bigger if he didn't have DV charges on his record, that's what keeps him there. tony will throw a bigger contract at almost anyone who gets big enough on the indies. they need to shake the rep of being the retirement home for misfit wrestlers with nowhere else to go. but i have no clue how you'd do that.
the second problem is accessibility. TNA is lucky to draw 30k viewers, let alone a milly. that's because, in addition to their shitty selection of wrestlers that no one wants to see, AXS is a channel that no one actually has, most people aren't even aware of its existence. i'd say they should sell TNA, cut their losses and let it live on a bigger channel, but TNA is what makes AXS money. so this is again another question that's not as simple as "just sell it bro" - that's like asking them to sell their whole company.
